New scores could use new features and not have to work around the bugs of earlier versions. Older scores that have been carefully tuned, compensating for earlier bugs, would continue to produce the intended result without having to be overhauled. There would be no need to maintain multiple versions.
- Bruce -----Original Message----- From: Erik Sandberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 3:55 PM To: Fairchild Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Evolutionary User Strategery On Saturday 08 July 2006 18:58, Fairchild wrote: > The 3.0 processor could note the 2.4 version flag and treat the ly > file in the 2.4 way, maintaining upward compatibility without a need > for convert-ly. In what way would that be different from installing two different versions of lily? If you don't want the bugfixes from 3.0, why do you upgrade to 3.0? -- Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user