New scores could use new features and not have to work around the bugs of
earlier versions. Older scores that have been carefully tuned, compensating
for earlier bugs, would continue to produce the intended result without
having to be overhauled. There would be no need to maintain multiple
versions.
- Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Sandberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 3:55 PM
To: Fairchild
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Evolutionary User Strategery
On Saturday 08 July 2006 18:58, Fairchild wrote:
> The 3.0 processor could note the 2.4 version flag and treat the ly
> file in the 2.4 way, maintaining upward compatibility without a need
> for convert-ly.
In what way would that be different from installing two different versions
of
lily? If you don't want the bugfixes from 3.0, why do you upgrade to 3.0?
--
Erik
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
