Hello, all!
Considering the following code:
%% CODE BEGINS
\version "2.9.5"
\paper
{
line-width = 4\in
indent = 0\in
}
\relative
{
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
c1\p\< c\!\f \break
c\p\< c\!_\markup { \dynamic f \italic "sempre" } \break
c\p\< c\!\f_\markup { \italic "sempre" } \break
c\p\< c\!\f-\tweak #'extra-offset #'( 2.6 . -1.2 ) _\markup
{ \italic "sempre" }
}
%% CODE ENDS
#1: Lilypond does a wonderful job of making (de-)crescendi end "at
the right spot" when there are subsequent dynamics.
#2: When the subsequent item is a dynamic within a \markup, the (de-)
crescendo ends early.
#3: Separating the two leads to position problems.
#4: The only "good" solution I've found is to separate and then tweak
the \markup item #'extra-offset.
Is there a better way to do what I want? I don't mind tweaking when
necessary, but it's time-consuming, especially when different score
editions are involved -- if there's an easier way to solve the
problem, I'd love to know about it.
Thanks,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
