On 4/29/06, Geoff Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I question that. I think it looks easy to you because you already know how it all works and fits together. I do agree that adding some more examples to the manual would help greatly.
Agreed. LilyPond is a domain-specific language. It is rather odd that it is necessary to break out into a different language to do a great many things. It is even odder that LilyPond doesn't use Scheme's macro and other capabilities to make even a sub-DSL. David _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
