Actually this does raise a question I have wondered about: What is the difference between R1 and r1 (or R2 and r2 or whatever)? Seems like in 4/4 you'd get a full-bar rest with either R1 or r1. I will say I've not experimented that much, and I always use R1*x (or whatever) when doing multiple-bar rests.
Quoting Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 9-Apr-06, at 4:26 PM, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > > > On Sunday 09 April 2006 00:16, Graham Percival wrote: > >> In all seriousness, having a \wholeBarRest command would involve a > >> nontrivial amount of extra programming. > > Wouldn't > > > > threst = \times 4/3{R2.} > > I think you mean > threst = \times 3/4 {R1} > or > therest = R1*3/4 > > That would certainly give you a full-bar rest in 3/4 time, but the big > problem would be making "threst" detect what time signature it was in, > and modify the "\times x/y" accordingly. > > Cheers, > - Graham > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > -- Carrick Patterson Little Rock AR _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user