> Have you tried the technique in the docs at > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/user/lilypond/Skipping-corrected-music.html
ah fantastic - that is almost what i had in mind with caching.. it doesn't create a whole document at the end, using the previous data, but it's still good for quick checking of new bars at the end of a score without the overhead of regenerating the entire score. thanks for that. On 2/14/06, Cameron Horsburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ramana Kumar wrote: > > what about caching the lilypond output in such a way that small > > changes to the ly code don't result in redoing all the parsing > > again... i mean say if someone only adds a bar to the end maybe some > > of the work wouldn't need to be redone? > > i understand lilypond does some work on the whole score which needs to > > be redone no matter how similar the new input file is... but there may > > be ways around this, or ways to speed it up. > > > > On 2/14/06, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Citerar Ben Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > >>>Running lilypond seems to take a while on my machine. For a project I'm > >>>working on it'd be nice to have much faster time to output. Maybe some of > >>>this time is spent for lilypond to load all of its fonts and set up. > >>> > >>>Instead of running lilypond.exe several times, is there a way to start > >>>lilypond so that it stays active? For example, it would sit and capture > >>>from > >>>stdin, creating a pdf/or png of the output whenever an eof is fed in, but > >>>only quitting upon recieving a certain code? I'm willing to do c++ coding > >>>if > >>>necessary. > >>> > >>>Or, ideally, a standard windows dll of lilypond that would only need to get > >>>set up once. > >>> > >>>And if it were possible to do this, would the time saving be significant? > >> > >>I think the only time that would be saved, is some of the setup which is > >>done > >>before lily displays "Parsing...". There was a discussion on lilypond-devel > >>recently, and IIRC Han-Wen thought that it would be rather easy to > >>implement a > >>lilypond daemon, but that the time savings would be rather small. > >> > >>Erik > >> > >> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>lilypond-user mailing list > >>lilypond-user@gnu.org > >>http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lilypond-user mailing list > > lilypond-user@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > Have you tried the technique in the docs at > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/user/lilypond/Skipping-corrected-music.html > > I haven't tried it, but it seems to do something similar to what you're > after. > > Cameron > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
