On 1/14/06, Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trevor - > > Interesting thread. Lily seems to be transitioning from development to > productization with bug reports drifting from "it doesn't work" to "maybe > foo would be better." Congraduations (sic). > > Thanks. > > - Bruce
Thank Jan and Han-Wen and Erik and Graham and everybody ... I'm just contributing dialog at this point, as opposed to actual work! But, yes, I agree: there's a lot of refinement afoot and I think it's going to benefit everybody. That particular thread you were pointing out from December is interesting because it starts to touch on the question of "how can we make lily's (input) syntax more uniform and, thereby, begin to suppress the need to know about program internals in the input syntax?". And, yet, at the same time, the ability to (for example) define special contexts is one of the very unique things about lily that should never disappear from the hands of those users that want it. So it will be very interesting this year working out ever easier syntax with ever better features! -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
