I would recommend you to first typeset your dynamics in a normal
stave attached to normal notes and make sure that you understand
exactly how they are positioned relative to the notes. Then, you can
simply replace the notes by skips and use them in the Dynamics
context instead. A good starting point, corresponding to what you
now have in your dynamics is:
\relative c'{
\time 2/4
c8\mf c4. \setTextCresc c\< c2 c4\f c\> c4\!
}
The misplaced text version crescendo is just one of several indications
that the template is a quick hack that would need polishing or an
complete redesign to work fully. It's really strange that nobody has
taken the time to revise it, since it apparently is used fairly often.
However, I wouldn't be surprised if the text version crescendi is
handled better by the alternative approach I referenced below.
/Mats
Thomas Ruedas wrote:
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 12:47, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
The duration of the skips is handled exactly as the duration of
ordinary notes. If you insert some bar checks, you will see that
the durations are probably not what you want:
Ok, thanks for confirming that.
Since the last duration specified above the dynamics is the d'8,
the duration of the first s is also an 8th note.
I don't think so: when I change the initial s into e.g. s2, the mf is
still placed at the beginning, but the subsequent stuff is moved to
the right. If things worked the way you say, this would imply that
the automatic propagation of durations has a scope larger than the
staff. I can't imagine that the developers would implement such a
design flaw.
In fact, I didn't find a way to move the mf further to the right.
You should note that the full template is a fairly ugly hack. There
[...]
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-08/msg00130.htm
Thanks again for the pointer, I'll try it out as an alternative later.
However, it seems to me that the other problem I had, namely the
ill-positioned text-version crescendo is not solved by that either.
Is there a solution to that or is it a bug?
Sorry if these questions are quite basic, but I am still new to
lilypond and with little time, I make only slow progress.
Thomas
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
