Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I wonder whether this should be changed too. This would mean that > > > > \clef alto > > \clef "alto" > > > > becomes > > > > \clef #"alto" > > > > or > > > > \clef #'alto > > > > This will simplify the syntax a bit, at the expense ease of entry. > > > > What do you think? > > I see some cases where this would be clearly a win. Few weeks ago, a > singer asked me to change all alto clefs to treble clefs in a > voice+piano reduction score. Just redefining the \clef music function > would have made that really easy and quick. > > The more music functions there are, and the less hardcoded syntax is, > the more extensible and flexible LilyPond is. Ideally, even \include > should be some kind of (not only-)music function, so that users could > define their own \include version (for including different files > depending on some parameters for instance, or adding a path). > I agree, it sounds like a good idea.
/Henrik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
