Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm also not sure it's a good idea. If you want python, it would be > better to start afresh with a python version of LilyPond, and move > speed-critical things to C(++). Then, end-result will be more > "pythonic"
> I imagine that the end result will be slower than the current > GUILE/Scheme combo. I bet it will be, unless lots of things will be written in C(++). I can't see the advantage of doing that: re-write something that is already working in c++/guile to c++/python. I could sea the advantage of re-writing lily in only one language. but this language would have to have a fast implementation and be dynamic and very high-level. I can't think of a better choice than common lisp ;-) Cheers, Pedro Kröger _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
