I suggested something similar (my original message isn't there, but it's referenced at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-07/msg00224.html ) Graham Percival had a few suggestions which are useful
However, having a standalone Lilypond preprocessor could be useful for a number of reasons. Would there be any interest in sponsoring this as a feature? Han-Wen -- how much would it cost? Cameron Horsburgh Bernard Hurley wrote: > A partial solution is to forget about guile, use \displayLilyMusic and > pipe lily's stdout to a file. However lily insists on creating .ps > and .pdf files, which I don't neccessarily want it to do. I'll look at > the implementation of \displayLilyMusic to see if I get any ideas. > > Thanks, > > Bernard > > On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 11:00 +0000, Bernard Hurley wrote: > > >>I think it ought to be possible to write a .ly file containing guile >>code that makes lilypond do the following: >> >> 1) Read another .ly file >> 2) parse that file >> 3) convert the resulting music to .ly source code >> 4) write this code to a third .ly file >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
