Tried: \override Slur #'positions = #'(stem . head) \override Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 ) \override Score.Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 ) \override Voice.Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 ) \override Slur #'positions = #'(( 13.0 . -13.0 ) ( 4.0 . 4.0 )) to no effect, not even errors. Tell me more.
-----Original Message----- From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 12:16 PM To: Fairchild Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Does what: \override Slur #'attachment = #'(stem . stem) Fairchild wrote: > Sure do miss the "\override Slur #'attachment = " feature in v 2.4.6. > Using "\override Slur #'control-points = " as a workaround is tedious. > Don't want to upgrade beyond 2.4.6 yet. > > Is there a better workaround or a way to patch in the missing Scheme > code? why don't you use #'positions ? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
