Tried:
 \override       Slur #'positions = #'(stem . head)
 \override       Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 )
 \override Score.Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 )
 \override Voice.Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 )
 \override       Slur #'positions = #'(( 13.0 . -13.0 ) ( 4.0 . 4.0 ))
to no effect, not even errors.
Tell me more.

-----Original Message-----
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 12:16 PM
To: Fairchild
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Does what: \override Slur #'attachment = #'(stem . stem)


Fairchild wrote:
> Sure do miss the "\override Slur #'attachment = " feature in v 2.4.6.  
> Using "\override Slur #'control-points = " as a workaround is tedious.  
> Don't want to upgrade beyond 2.4.6 yet.
> 
> Is there a better workaround or a way to patch in the missing Scheme 
> code?

why don't you use #'positions ?


-- 
  Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen





_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to