Hi Vaughan,

I grew up with transposed scores like this- for me, 5 flats is as clean as any other key. I did spend my teenage years playing Böhm’s flute études in all 24 keys, which maybe not every chorister has done. I have seen younger singers who have been trained to transpose be put off by the key signatures, especially if they specialise in early music. In the tablet era this is less of a problem except for the conductor knowing how to refer to particular notes.

If you are really put off by 5 flats, you might put it in 2 sharps and specify to sing it at A=415Hz, as most absolute pitch singers these days should have at least some experience with baroque pitch.

Not meaning to provoke a prolonged argument about what Gabriel rightly described as a "long-standing debate" - in the "original written key vs. transpose to sounding pitch" debate for Franco-Flemish music, both sides have valid arguments, they only have differing priorities -, but I just want to point out that, at least for me personally, the discomfort at seeing a Lasso piece with ♭♭♭♭♭ does not stem from a general dislike of multi-accidental key signatures. (These are great in Bruckner, or Janáček, or Brian Wilson!) Instead, for me it is an expression of the discomfort felt at seeing a piece of music, written in some specific historical time, notated using pitches of which the original composer had no notion. Mozart, even Bach could have written a piece in F♯ major just as easily as in F major (although they usually chose not to, both for reasons of tradition/convention and reasons of tuning), while for Lasso, that notion would literally be inconceivable. The idea of arbitrary transposition had not been born yet.

More concretely, for a Mixolydian piece like /Genuit puerpera regem/, the choice is not whether to write in G-mixolydian, F-mixolydian, D-mixolydian, A♭-mixolydian etc., but only whether to write in the "original" mixolydian or the "transposed" mixolydian (C-Mixolydian, with ♭ key signature). (I'm lying a bit here, since I'm not really an expert on the historical development of key signatures and the gradual emergence of ideas such as double transposition = ♭♭ key signature with F-Mixolydian.)

But, as I said, there are also good reasons to create a performing edition in "A♭ mixolydian" if that, pitch definitions being what they are these days, is what's used in a specific performance.

Lukas

Reply via email to