joe ferguson wrote:
My experience is pretty well limited the choral literature. In that
genre the usual interpretation of the tenuto is one of subtle
emphasis, as an indication of phrasing.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
I would say that this is a more universal observation. E.g. the
interpretation of sfz , > and ^ also depend on the composer/era.
IOW I don't care what you call it. I just want to be able to engrave
the musical symbol. We could discuss how to interpret it for a long
time but that's not really the job of the LilyPond docs.
Paul Scott
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
