On Monday 18 July 2005 19.12, Laura Conrad wrote: > >>>>> "ES" == Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ES> I don't see why any non-guru would want to set whichBar > ES> explicitly, so perhaps that documentation should be moved to > ES> internals. > > The reason I use it from time to time (maybe I'm a guru, but the > problem is definitely not a guru problem) is that if you move the > barline engraver from the score context to the staff context, you need > it to get any bars at all. > > The reason to move the barline engraver is that I sometimes find it > easier to find errors in note entry if the erroneous barlines aren't > duplicated in all staves of a score.
OK, then perhaps it shouldn't be removed from the manual. However, the property is still a bit too odd to be mentioned in the "Basic Notation" chapter IMHO, perhaps it's better to move it to somewhere in the internals docu, or to an example in tips&tricks. > So I would say that a non-guru might well need to use whichBar rather > than bar. If \bar would work for the barline engraver in any context, > then maybe what you say would be true. You could write such a bar command in Scheme, but that's even more guru:ish. Bar = #(def-music-function (parser loc str) (string?) (context-spec-music (make-property-set 'whichBar str) 'Timing) ) \new Staff { c \Bar #"|." c } Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user