> 
> On Tue 18 Feb 2025 at 17:56:02 (+0000), Richard Shann wrote:
> > At https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/glissando
> > under the section
> > Contemporary glissando
> > is this example (without the whole bar rest at the end).
> > 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><
> > \version "2.25.18"
> > \relative c'' {
> > \time 3/4
> > \override Glissando.style = #'zigzag
> > c4 c
> > \cadenzaOn
> > c4\glissando
> > \hideNotes
> > c,,4
> > \unHideNotes
> > \cadenzaOff
> > \bar "|"
> > % R1*4/4 
> > }
> > 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><
> > 
> > When the whole measure rest is present two whole measure rests appear and 
> > an 
> > empty bar.
> > 
> > Is there a fix for this?
> 
> A fix would necessitate knowing what you want to print.
> 
> Perhaps it's something like the attached?
> 
> Cheers,
> David.

Hello Richard and David,

Here is what I had, fyi. I used \after function to give the glissando some fine 
tuning while the content of the measure not spilled over to the next measure. 
While I could see the rationale behind using \cadenzaOn and \cadenzaOff, I fear 
that it affects the overall spacing. For glissando of this kind, I think that 
it is best to keep the issue of spacing as intact as possible. So my example 
doesn’t use the \cadenza… functions.

All the best,
Yoshi 

\version "2.25.18"
\relative c'' {
  \time 3/4
  \override Glissando.style = #'zigzag
  c4 c4
  \after 8.. {\hideNotes
  {c,,32}
  \unHideNotes
  } c''4\glissando
  \bar "|" 
R2.
}




Reply via email to