On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 8:48 AM Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Actually, the descriprion is wrong, imho. > > > > (bracket-text ,ly:grob? "The text for an analysis bracket.") > > > > should become something at he lines of: > > > > (bracket-text ,ly:grob? "The text-grob for an analysis bracket.") > > I plan to change the docstring to > > A pointer to the text grob of an analysis bracket. > > >> Can you please give an example how to use it (or a link to > >> something similar)? > > > > I took horizontal-bracket-texted.ly from our regtests and added > > functionality in \layout to emphasize some brackets with thickness > > and color relying on the 'text. [...] > > Thanks a lot! > > >> As mentioned earlier, neither `bracket-text` nor `pedal-text` are > >> used anywhere in the code. > > > > Well, yes. Though if you go through those internal properties then you > > will notice that a plethora of them are not used in the .scm-files. > > Some examples: > > accidental-grobs > > all-elements > > concurrent-hairpins > > ... > > I now wonder whether it make sense to orthogonalize the property names > (to a certain extent). For example, I can imagine that all properties > that are pointers to grobs have a final `-grob` or `-grobs` in their > names. Thus: > > bracket-text-grob > all-element-grobs > concurrent-hairpin-grobs > ... > +1 -- Trevor Bača www.trevorbaca.com soundcloud.com/trevorbaca
