Good-oh, indeed.
It's true that special characters can cause inconsistent results in
almost anything but if you're searching Documentation for a command that
includes them, you expect the search to be 'complete'; i.e.,
encompassing all possibities.
This search capability does not seem to be complete. If I could find
out more about it, I might be able to dig into it and find out why. I
don't know how the documentation is put together though. It's obviously
very sophisticated but it doesn't seem familiar.
J.
On 1/8/24 01:09, Brian Barker wrote:
At 23:10 07/01/2024 -1000, you wrote:
It does indeed.
Good-oh!
However, I wonder why these symbols are not searchable. For example,
when I search within the page you cite, they are findable. However,
if I go to the top of the Documentation tree, they are not.
Not sure. I'm not sure were you are searching, in fact. But different
search techniques will anyway do different things with
non-alphanumeric characters, I think. Is that relevant?
There's no way I would probably find these without your help. Am I
missing something?
Don't know, I'm afraid.
Brian Barker
--
John Helly, University of California, San Diego / San Diego Supercomputer
Center / Scripps Institution of Oceanography / 760 840 8660 mobile /
http://www.sdsc.edu/~hellyj
ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3779-0603
