Hello, Le ven. 6 oct. 2023 à 15:19, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> a écrit :
> > > All of LilyPond's dependencies definitely are GPLv3-compatible (or > > we could not distribute official binaries on lilypond.org). > > I don't have access to my old Mac in the next days, but there is a > possibility to actually check that in more detail. One of the > MacPorts maintainers, Joshua Root, wrote the following some time ago > on the 'macports-users' list: > > > List which ports do and don't have an archive available (for your > > current OS version and arch): > > <https://gist.github.com/jmroot/f524dcfe5fdadcd8b7a9c2e46151e0d4> > > > > List which ports are and aren't considered distributable: > > <https://gist.github.com/jmroot/f84c329919356bfb1ed2d8425f3cfebb> > > Maybe somebody who is using MacPorts can run those two TCL scripts and > report back, especially the second one? If LilyPond doesn't appear in > the non-distributable list it should be possible to ask the MacPorts > maintainers to actively switch on binary-package generation. If this > can be done, installation of LilyPond should be *much* faster on > MacPorts. > It's in the non-distributable list: not-distributable.txt:lilypond "lilypond" is not distributable because its license "GPL-3+" conflicts with license "GPL-2" of dependency "libpaper" not-distributable.txt:lilypond-devel "lilypond-devel" is not distributable because its license "GPL-3+" conflicts with license "GPL-2" of dependency "libpaper" The first script is still running. I will report when it ends. -- JJ Fleck Physique et Informatique PCSI1 Lycée Kléber
