Lukas-Fabian Moser <l...@gmx.de> writes: > Hi Valentin, > > Am 01.09.23 um 00:41 schrieb Valentin Petzel: >> I don’t think this is a particularly good idea. Lilypond conceptually first >> creates data for the sementic meaning of the music (or the actual content) >> and >> have engravers turn this into graphical content. >> >> Mapping pitches to other pitches is not a layout option, but a musical >> transformation and should thus be done on the music level, not the layout >> level. Using an engraver will mean it is hard to combine this with other >> musical transformations, and it will also cause order issues as soon as you >> have an engraver that depends on the pitch property. > > I agree about the possible problems, and to be honest, I wasn't aware > that a music function solution like yours can deal with \transpose and > \relative gracefully (since the assignment of actual pitches is > complete when the music function is applied on the outside).
Iff the music function is applied on the outside. -- David Kastrup
