Le jeudi 27 avril 2023 à 14:57 +0200, Gianmaria Lari a écrit : > Regarding my second question, let me try to be more clear > > I have a score. > I want to write the dynamics using a separate variable. > Suppose that on the first quarter of the tenth measure there is a "forte" and > then on the note of the next bar there is a "piano." If all the measures have > the same "time signature", let's say of 4/4, then it's pretty easy: just > count the beats and multiply by 4. Finally you will write: > > > > s1*9 s4\f s4*3 s4\p > > > The operation is not difficult but making mistakes is pretty easy. In fact > this system works well if the "time signature" does not change or changes > very little in the piece. Otherwise you have to add up the duration of each > note individually and making mistakes becomes extremely easy. > > This thing always seemed so inconvenient to me that I thought it was > practically unusable. Or that there was some trick to maybe have Frescobaldi > tell me the "position" of the note (meant as numbers of quarter or eight > notes from the beginning). > > Hope I have been more clear.
This sounds like it might be a use case for Jan-Peter Voigt's "Edition engraver" tool. https://github.com/openlilylib/edition-engraver
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
