Valentin Petzel <valen...@petzel.at> writes: > Hi David, > > one important thing this talk has taught us is that you are not too > fluent with Frescobaldi :).
You bet. But I still considered it a saner choice to showcase compared to Emacs (which is what I use). Maybe someone™ should just use all of the libraries Frescobaldi uses for parsing LilyPond stuff to bootstrap a first Emacs mode worth its salt. I also discovered that the Frescobaldi documentation talks about Rumor integration while in the actual editor Rumor support appears to have been replaced by native MIDI support with less functionality. The native MIDI support would require recording of timing information to facilitate better chord/note distinction and quantisation support. -- David Kastrup
