Le samedi 18 février 2023 à 08:01 +0000, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > ``` > > >> The issue I filed is not related to `strict-grace-spacing` at all. > > > > It’s quite related. [...] > > With 'related' I meant that there are two separate bugs. I didn't > talk about what the best fix for the whole problem actually is. > > > In strict-grace-spacing mode, grace columns are not part of the main > > chain of springs that goes through the whole system from column to > > columns and stretches or compresses. Instead, they are placed > > separately. That’s the easiest way of making the space between a > > grace and its main note non-stretching that I can think of. > > Yes. The only problem is what to do if there isn't sufficient space > for the grace note. > > > The other way would be add very strong springs to make the > > distances “almost” fixed, but it would be ugly. > > What exactly would be ugly? > > > To me, the issue is essentially requesting two things: a) make > > strict-grace-spacing less buggy, b) make strict-grace-spacing the > > default. > > I agree with both. However, until this gets fixed, I wonder whether > there are work-arounds that could be applied.
I missed it at first, but it's actually very easy in your example.
```
\version "2.24.0"
{
\override Score.GraceSpacing.spacing-increment = 0
\omit Staff.TimeSignature
\repeat unfold 16 { \grace e'8 d'4 } \break
\repeat unfold 8 { \grace e'8 d'4 }
}
\paper { indent = 0 }
```
The main caveat is that if you have a heterogeneous grace group like `\grace {
e'8 f'16 g'16 }`, it will make all notes from the group spaced equally.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
