Or even better ;-) : scriptDefinitions.ricochet = ...
This would make a great addition to the snippet repository. Thanks, Mark On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:21 PM Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> wrote: > On 25/01/2023 22:57, Martín Rincón Botero wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > is there any way to make this markup mockup of a jeté symbol into a > > proper articulation (so that Lilypond knows how to give it an > > appropriate direction, f. ex.)? I suspect a Scheme workaround might be > > possible :-). > > > > \markup \undertie .... > > \markup \overtie .... > > > > Or is it something that needs to be baked into the font? Btw., "jeté" > > is part of the SMuFL standard. See > > http://www.smufl.org/version/1.2/range/stringTechniques/. It would be > > nice to add a symbol for this to Lilypond by default. > > > Try > > \version "2.24.0" > > jetéMarkup = \markup \undertie \pad-x #0.3 \pattern #4 #X #0.2 \musicglyph > "dots.dot" > > > \layout { > \context { > \Score > scriptDefinitions = > #(acons 'jeté > `((padding . 0.5) > (direction . ,DOWN) > (stencil > . ,(lambda (grob) > (grob-interpret-markup > grob > (if (eqv? DOWN (ly:grob-property grob 'direction)) > jetéMarkup > #{ \markup \scale #'(1 . -1) \jetéMarkup #}))))) > default-script-alist) > } > } > > jeté = #(make-music 'ArticulationEvent 'articulation-type 'jeté) > > { > c'\jeté c'^\jeté c'_\jeté > } > > > It would be nice if you could spell that as > > scriptDefinitions.jeté = ... > > > but infrastructure for nested context properties is not implemented yet, > unlike grob properties where you can do > \override Grob.property.subproperty = foo. > > Best, > Jean > >
