Hi Valentin, > Suppose we had a different way of specifying chords not as a bunch of notes, > but in a representation that preserves the theoretical meaning of such a > chord.
The GSoC work was working towards exactly that. > This way we could have a transposable syntax to say e.g. des|c to specify Db > major over C major or even g|dis:m|cis:m or something and would be able to > quickly get the chord specification we actually want, instead of having to do > something like c:3.5.9-.11.13- or even something like this > cis,:m3.5.9.11.13.19-.21.23-. We really need something like this. Kieren.
