Am So., 24. Okt. 2021 um 18:19 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com>: > > On 2021-10-24 8:05 am, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Am So., 24. Okt. 2021 um 16:35 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill > >> Let me take a stab at converting the print routine to Scheme. > > > > Would be great !! > > Sorry for the delay...
Delay? I noticed no delay... > took me some time to figure out why there was an > error with cross-staff right-side Y coordinate after porting the logic > from C++. I think it's all working as expected, and I have added a few > new test cases. (NOTE: I only have 2.22.0 here, so I had to fixup the > version statement.) The one thing I did not include was adjusting the > line ends for the arrows, but I assume the crosses would be best put at > the arrow points anyway. Great, I don't have time left today to study it, maybe tomorrow evening... > There is something to note in the original logic. If the padding is > large enough that the line spanner would disappear, then the stencil > returned is null. I am also likewise returning the empty list instead > of a point-pair, so the code that consumes the results would need to > check for this case. Understood. > > -- Aaron Hill Again, many, many thanks! Best, Harm
