> On Sep 15, 2021, at 9:16 PM, Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2021-09-15 6:49 pm, Stanton Sanderson wrote:
>> I am trying to reproduce a manuscript which use an old style bass
>> clef. A screen shot from <http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=900
>> <http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=900>> is shown below.The code
>> apparently worked at one time, but fails when I run it.
>> %% <= http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Old-Bass-Clef-td28833.html
>> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Old-Bass-Clef-td28833.html>
>> % add by P.P.Schneider on March 2014. Edited on June. 2017.
>> The LSR snippet is a bit long, so I’m not reproducing it here. I would
>> be grateful for some help- perhaps someone has an update?
> 
> Seems to be some odd quoting going on.  Does this version work better?
> 
> %%%%
> my-clef =
> #(ly:make-stencil
> '(path 0.001
>    (moveto   -0.10  -0.35
>     curveto  -0.10  -1.11   0.48  -1.80   1.25  -1.80
>     curveto   1.75  -1.80   2.20  -1.60   2.50  -1.05
>     curveto   2.55  -0.95   2.50  -0.90   2.43  -0.95
>     curveto   2.20  -1.17   1.90  -1.48   1.45  -1.48
>     curveto   0.70  -1.48   0.15  -0.85   0.15  -0.15
>     curveto   0.15   0.45   0.62   0.83   1.05   0.83
>     curveto   1.55   0.83   1.90   0.50   1.90   0.05
>     curveto   1.90  -0.35   1.55  -0.71   1.20  -0.71
>     curveto   0.80  -0.71   0.60  -0.40   0.63  -0.17
>     curveto   0.75  -0.30   0.90  -0.31   1.00  -0.31
>     curveto   1.20  -0.31   1.38  -0.10   1.38   0.15
>     curveto   1.38   0.35   1.20   0.55   0.95   0.55
>     curveto   0.60   0.52   0.39   0.25   0.39  -0.05
>     curveto   0.39  -0.52   0.62  -0.89   1.20  -0.89
>     curveto   1.65  -0.89   2.07  -0.50   2.07   0.10
>     curveto   2.07   0.66   1.56   1.01   1.05   1.01
>     curveto   0.28   1.01  -0.10   0.35  -0.10  -0.35
>     moveto    2.42   0.20
>     curveto   2.54   0.20   2.64   0.30   2.64   0.42
>     curveto   2.64   0.54   2.54   0.64   2.42   0.64
>     curveto   2.30   0.64   2.20   0.54   2.20   0.42
>     curveto   2.20   0.30   2.30   0.20   2.42   0.20
>     moveto    2.42  -0.20
>     curveto   2.54  -0.20   2.64  -0.30   2.64  -0.42
>     curveto   2.64  -0.54   2.54  -0.64   2.42  -0.64
>     curveto   2.30  -0.64   2.20  -0.54   2.20  -0.42
>     curveto   2.20  -0.30   2.30  -0.20   2.42  -0.20
>     closepath)
>    round round #t)
>  (cons -0.1 2.65)
>  (cons -1.3 1))
> %%%%
> 
Aaron,

Unfortunately, no. With Lilypond 2.23.3, substituting \clef my-clef for \cleff 
bass in the code results in Frescobaldi’s Lilypond Log spitting out a list of 
supported types:

warning: unknown clef type `my-clef'
warning: supported clefs: C F G G2 GG…. (And so on). Will look further tomorrow.

Thank you!

Reply via email to