Guten Tag Torsten,
danke schön, this too works well indeed !
All the best,
Philippe

Le sam. 27 mars 2021 à 22:16, <torsten.haemme...@web.de> a écrit :

> Dear Philippe,
>
>
>
> I guess a sensible solution for Bach’s B minor mass example would be just
> using \time 2/4 overriding the time signature stencil so that traditional
> alla breve time signature symbol will be printed:
>
>
>
> Minimal example, showing the beginning of the Alto I/II part:
>
>
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%
>
> \version "2.22.0"
>
>
>
> \relative {
>
>   \once \override Staff.TimeSignature.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
>
>   \once \override Staff.TimeSignature.text = \markup \musicglyph
> #"timesig.C22"
>
>   \time 4/2
>
>   \key d \major
>
>   R1*2 |
>
>   r1 r2 d'2( |
>
>   e) fis g fis4 e |
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> All the best
>
> Torsten
>
>
>
> *Von:* lilypond-user <lilypond-user-bounces+torsten.haemmerle=
> web...@gnu.org> *Im Auftrag von *Philippe ZELLER
> *Gesendet:* Samstag, 27. März 2021 21:04
> *An:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
> *Betreff:*
>
>
>
> Dear lilypond fellow users,
>
> it sometimes occurs in barock music that only every other barline is
> visible, (see e.g. Haendel's Salomo, choir at the end of Act II ) or that
> every other barline is printed in reduced size.(see e.g. Bach Mass in
> H-moll, nr 27 "dona nobis pacem" ).
>
> Is there a way to get this result in lilypond ?
>
>
>
> I first tried
>
> \set Score.barLineVisibility = #(every-nth-bar-number-visible 2)
>
> that I made up after an equivalent syntax for barNumber, but to no avail.
> Maybe I didn't put it in the right context ?
>
>
>
> Finally I used a rather complicated procedure based on
>
> global = {
>
>       \repeat unfold 24 { s2. \once \override Staff.BarLine.transparent =
> ##t  s2. \once \override Staff.BarLine.transparent = ##f }
>
>         }
>
> which works but is not fully compatible, for example it does not work with
> multiMeasureRests.
>
>
>
> Many thanks in advance for your suggestions !
>
>
>
  • [no subject] Philippe ZELLER
    • Re: Aaron Hill
      • Re: Philippe ZELLER
    • AW: torsten.haemmerle
      • Re: Philippe ZELLER

Reply via email to