Hello,
I'd like to draw your attention to a potential issue that results from
the edge case interaction of footnotes and the completion_heads/rests
engravers.
\version "2.23.0"
\new Voice \with
{
\remove "Note_heads_engraver"
\consists "Completion_heads_engraver"
\remove "Rest_engraver"
\consists "Completion_rest_engraver"
}
\relative c'' {
c2^"notehead test"
%% FOOTNOTE NO.1
\footnote #'(1/4 . -4) "Sibelius"
c2. b4 b a
a2
%% FOOTNOTE NO.2
\once \override Score.FootnoteItem.annotation-line = ##f
\footnote #'(-1/4 . 4) "Symphony No.6"
g2. a4 g e
%% FOOTNOTE NO.3
\footnote #'(0 . -3) "IV. Allegro molto"
r1.^"rest test" r2
%% FOOTNOTE NO.4
\once \override Score.FootnoteItem.annotation-line = ##f
\footnote #'(0 . -2) "Symphony No.6"
a,\longa
}
As you can see, each footnote is invoked repeatedly whenever the
engravers have to print additional heads/rests.
Thank you for your attention.
Hello,
Well, yes, that is a bug, occurring with the
\tweak-like form of \footnote. Please report
it to bug-lilypond (see lilypond.org/contact.html
<lilypond.org/contact.html>).
As a workaround, try using the \override-like
form, which doesn't have this bug:
\version "2.23.1"
\new Voice \with
{
\remove "Note_heads_engraver"
\consists "Completion_heads_engraver"
\remove "Rest_engraver"
\consists "Completion_rest_engraver"
}
\relative c'' {
c2^"notehead test"
%% FOOTNOTE NO.1
\footnote #'(1/4 . -4) "Sibelius" NoteHead
c2. b4 b a
a2
%% FOOTNOTE NO.2
\once \override Score.FootnoteItem.annotation-line = ##f
\footnote #'(-1/4 . 4) "Symphony No.6" NoteHead
g2. a4 g e
%% FOOTNOTE NO.3
\footnote #'(0 . -3) "IV. Allegro molto" Rest
r1.^"rest test" r2
%% FOOTNOTE NO.4
\once \override Score.FootnoteItem.annotation-line = ##f
\footnote #'(0 . -2) "Symphony No.6" NoteHead
a,\longa^"Hi"
}
Regards,
Jean
