Actually, I just noticed that if the new tempo is supposed to appear in a
new system after the accel., the new tempo is not shown with this code. Any
other ideas on how to properly write an aligned accel. with a new tempo?
Am Mi., 9. Sept. 2020 um 10:38 Uhr schrieb Martín Rincón Botero <
martinrinconbot...@gmail.com>:
> I know we don't have this, and that tempo spanners have been requested
> before. I just wanted to know how you deal with it for the time being,
> especially in cases where simply using a text spanner and an additional
> tempo marking in an independent tempo variable doesn't work as expected,
> for example because a melody raises the new tempo, and a text spanner can't
> align with the new tempo marking. After a lot of fiddling, I got to this
> solution:
>
> \override TextSpanner #'to-barline = ##t
> \override TextSpanner.bound-details.left-broken.text = ##f
> \override TextSpanner.bound-details.right-broken.text = ##f
> \override TextSpanner #'(bound-details left text) = "accel."
> \override TextSpanner #'(bound-details right text) = \markup {
> \transparent "t" \smaller \general-align #Y #DOWN \note #"4" #1 \upright "=
> 66"}
> s2. s4\startTextSpan
> s1
> \once \hide Score.MetronomeMark
> \tempo 4 = 66
> s1\stopTextSpan
>
> This gives as a result a perfectly aligned accel. with a new tempo
> marking. It's all quite manual, of course (note the transparent "t"!), but
> it gives the desired result. Do y'all use a better/more efficient approach?
>
> Best regards,
> Martín.
>
> --
> www.martinrinconbotero.com
>
--
www.martinrinconbotero.com
