On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:18 PM Paolo Prete <paolopr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > (Also in response to Carl) > In Italy, we call this approach "fare la morale". > C's answer made P's words look like: > > "Hey, please develop this for me." And the answer was, more or less (---> do > the moral): > "If you want it to develop, collect the money." > I'm sorry I gave that impression. I did not intend to do so. In fact, your collecting money would have no affect on my desire to work on this issue. > This is absolutely the opposite of my intentions. > Instead, I pointed out that the lack of a cautionary pedal is not simply > something that can be improved. And I have no problem using ugly workaround > to solve it (I'm in control of my code). > Instead, it is a general problem that makes the pedal ** unusable *** in any > professional score. > And it's not a problem for me, but it's a problem especially for novice users. > > In any case, I reported the problem to the developers. Just as I reported to > Harm that there is an error on the snippet's Midi. > They will decide what to do, according to the time they can or want to > dedicate to the thing. > I must have misinterpreted your words. I considered your words to say that if nobody responded to your post, the thread would be wasted. I don't believe anybody that I'm aware of right now is likely to jump on changing pedals from TextScript to TextSpanner, so I don't think anything is likely to come from your request in the near future. I was merely trying to keep you from being disappointed when nobody took up the issue. Again, I am sorry for sounding harsh and polemical. I certainly did not intend to. Carl
