-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Szab rpd Zoltn wrote on 29.03.2005 10:33: | I have to confess that I have connected PC-s with printer cable (at least I | thought it was printer cable) long time ago, and I don't recall the exact | method, so you may well right. | I just checked Total Commander (do you know this software), which supports | this, and its help speaks about "Direct cable connection through parallel | port". I quote a short passage, if it makes more sense. | <quote start> | The PORT connection through the parallel port allows to transfer data | between two computers in the same room over a special parallel cable. This | cable can be found in most computer shops under the name "Interlink/Laplink | parallel cable" or "parallel cable for direct cable connection". It allows a | transfer rate of about 50kB/sec. The function therefore cannot be used as a | network, but is meant to synchronize data between two machines (e.g. a | desktop and a notebook). You need a pair of network cards for a permanent | connection. | <quote end>
I have to confess I forgot the fact that most printer cables today are bi-directional and that makes them capable of transferring data between PCs just as well as a serial link cable. So my bad, I just hadn't done this with a parallel cable personally, because when I needed to do this parallel cables weren't bi-directional and so there was no alternative to serial links for me. So just excuse my being ignorant, please. =)
| However, I mentioned it as a tip, I believe "the" problem was not with the | physical method of moving the files from one computer to another, but what | files from where, and what to do with those, i.e. the usage of Cygwin | setup.exe.
That's certainly true, I'm just a person that's always eager to learn and so I presume of others that they are too. After all the net is a place where you have lots of information but most is not verifiable and unfortunately many people think that they have the obligation to express an opinion where the really have the RIGHT to. This is not meant as an offense because I feel it doesn't have much to do with the issue discussed above, it's more of a philospohical point of view.
Regards from Germany, Roman. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCSVzen0kyIx7rF68RAhT4AJ9xmxDeBK8X+6FGVO+Hajg5x6xLRACgmQex mh5LzfxdjKvudnFWEeRDvBE= =YQgW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
