Thanks!
While not what I was expecting, it works well for me. (I was expecting them to
have been merged into a single grob, not to be printed on top of eachother). If
anyone was curious about it, my rather more aggressive hack was:
%%%%%%%%%
\version "2.19.84"
{ <f'! fis'> <\tweak Accidental.alteration #1/2 fih' fis'> }
%%%%%%%%%
> 25 feb. 2020 kl. 16:25 skrev Pierre Perol-Schneider
> <pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Leo,
> Since I don't know how you made it, here's what I'd do:
>
> \version "2.19.84"
> { <f'! fis'> <fis' \tweak Accidental.X-offset #1.2 fis'> }
> %% or
> { <fis' f'!> <fis'! \tweak Accidental.X-offset #1.2 fis'!> }
>
> So also a hack.
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
> Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 14:46, Leo Correia de Verdier
> <leo.correia.de.verd...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Dear list!
>
> Is there a neat way to achieve two (unmerged) accidentals of the same type in
> front of an unison? I can produce the attached output by means of some
> hacking, but am wondering if there is a way of preventing them being merged
> in the first place.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> /Leo
