If I replace the bits in the book/bookparts section with a single markup, the only difference I can see between 2.19.80 and 2.12.3 is that the top margin is slightly different and the later version includes a page number.

--
Phil Holmes


----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org>
To: "Peter Gentry" <peter.gen...@sunscales.myzen.co.uk>
Cc: <peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk>; "Lilypond Users" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: problems with cues


"Peter Gentry" <peter.gen...@sunscales.myzen.co.uk> writes:

It seems that the issue reared its head as a result of my "erroneous"
assumption that

\book {

     Page layout stuff for front page

}

\bookpart {

    Header & music

}

\bookpart {

    Header & music

}

Was a way to go.



Although this has worked over the years it doesn't today.

A toplevel \bookpart belongs to the "default" book, and a toplevel \book
introduces a non-default book.

Can someone with access to older versions check whether this was
different at some not-too-distant point of time in history?  If it was,
something intended to be a "refactoring" might have been an actual
change.  I am not ruling that out, but should be surprised if it were
so.

--
David Kastrup




Reply via email to