Malte, I just changed the musicglyph to the G_change and F_change. So, for
a single code that could be applied to initial clefs and clef changes, it
would be necessary to create such clefs as new clefs?
doubleF = {
\once \omit Staff.ClefModifier
\once \override Staff.Clef.layer = -1
\once \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup {
\combine \combine
\musicglyph #"clefs.F_change"
\translate #'(2.2 . 0) \with-color #white \beam #0.5 #0 #1.5
\translate #'(1.7 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.F_change"
}
}
doubleG = {
\once \omit Staff.ClefModifier
\once \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup {
\combine \musicglyph #"clefs.G_change"
\translate #'(1.5 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.G_change"
}
}
tripleG = {
\once \omit Staff.ClefModifier
\once \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
\once \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup {
\combine \combine
\musicglyph #"clefs.G_change"
\translate #'(1.5 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.G_change"
\translate #'(3 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.G_change"
}
}
Alexandre
http://soundcloud.com/alexandre-ficagna
Em ter, 22 de out de 2019 às 11:31, Alexandre Ficagna <
alexandre.fica...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Beautiful. Thanks!
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
>> From: Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de>
>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:23:48 +0200
>> Subject: Re: Double clefs (or even triple)
>>
>>
>> Am 19.10.19 um 14:56 schrieb Alexandre Ficagna:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > as Lilypond now have double G clefs with the \clef GG I'm wondering why
>> > there's no \clef FF or even more like \clef GGG and \clef FFF for 15a
>> > and 15b
>>
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> I’ve never seen that, when are such clefs used?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Malte
>>
>> > Still, I tried this:
>> > doubleF = {
>> > \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
>> > \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup { \combine \musicglyph #"clefs.F"
>> > \translate #'(2 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.F" }
>> > }
>> >
>> > But the ":" in the first F clef keep it away from an elegant solution.
>> >
>> > Any help?
>>
>> You could lay a white rectangle over the dots:
>>
>> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>> \version "2.19.83"
>>
>> doubleF = {
>> \omit Staff.ClefModifier
>> \override Staff.Clef.layer = -1
>> \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
>> \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup {
>> \combine \combine
>> \musicglyph #"clefs.F"
>> \translate #'(2.2 . 0) \with-color #white \beam #0.5 #0 #1.5
>> \translate #'(1.7 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.F"
>> }
>> }
>>
>> doubleG = {
>> \omit Staff.ClefModifier
>> \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
>> \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup {
>> \combine \musicglyph #"clefs.G"
>> \translate #'(1.5 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.G"
>> }
>> }
>>
>> \relative {
>> \clef GG
>> g1
>> \clef "treble_8"
>> \doubleG
>> g
>> \clef "bass_8"
>> \doubleF
>> f,
>> }
>> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
