Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >>>> Seriously? C++ has loops, you don't need goto for that. >>> >>> What construction do you suggest as a replacement? >> >> A loop? > > Well, yes. However, everything seems quite inelegant and bloated to > me in comparison to this simple `goto' [and I don't think that such a > local `goto' is something to be avoided at all costs]. > > In other words, I would be really thankful for replacement > suggestions. > >>> I have no idea what you are talking about. What is not coherent in >>> your opinion? You don't like the >>> >>> c'4\startGroup\stopGroup >>> >>> construction? For me this looks like a quite natural extension >>> (which, I guess, most of us have tried already) – at least for >>> horizontal brackets. >> >> Can you describe in a short paragraph what constructs are allowed, >> what results are expected, and what constructs may be processed but >> deliver a warning? That's sort of what defines a feature. > > In NR, there is > > Analysis brackets > ----------------- > > Brackets are used in musical analysis to indicate structure in > musical pieces. Simple horizontal brackets are supported. > > <example> > > Analysis brackets may be nested. > > <example> > > I would only add > > It is possible to start and end a bracket at the same musical > moment. > > <example>
So how do you distinguish a nested bracket starting and ending at the same musical moment to ending one bracket and starting the next at the same musical moment? > to the documentation. The documentation is not an inspiration for experiments but should make clear what happens when doing what. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
