Karlin High <karlinh...@gmail.com> writes: > On 3/5/2019 11:10 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> I don't know if anybody has tried building 64-bit executables in GUB >>> using the current Darwin SDK. If that works, we'd have a regular >>> build. But I don't think that's a feasible path forward long-term. > >> I think it would be feasible and likely the best way forward but there >> is no "current Darwin SDK" in use and I don't know what the current >> status of such SDKs would be. > > I got the impression that GUB is parsing the target names to determine > architecture and bitness. So I tried adding a "darwin-64" to the list > of platforms in gub/settings.py just to see what would happen. It > sort-of tried, then said something about its dependency for > osx-lilypad doesn't exist for the platform.
Yes, Lilypad is a graphical application. It would likely have to go. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user