Please show me how you mean what you are talking about I cannot understand this. I believe this is an essential piece when composing orchestral works and making the parts for the parts and players. Thank you.
Xavier Scheuer wrote > Hello, > > I use VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer as described in > input/regression/divisi-staves.ly > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/input/regression/a6/lily-436997bb.ly > > See more info on the bug tracker of issue 3518. > https://code.google.com/archive/p/lilypond/issues/3518 > > Works very well but unfortunately not documented in the Notation > Reference manual it seems. > > Cheers, > Xavier > > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 03:07, Reggie < > reegistoop@ > > wrote: >> >> For those of you who engrave orchestral music in which the strings often > have >> your typical divisi a2 or a3 >> >> Suppose a performance is coming up and you need to print parts from the > full >> score. >> >> So when you go to engrave the individual parts for any of the strings for >> example, (say Violin I), would you: >> >> a) always leave the Violin I "as is" and just \new Staff the violin > variable >> as it appears in the full score regardless of divisi complexity / >> independence >> --*(Violin I all on one staff for part) >> b) only leave the Violin I as is from the full score if it's a simple > score >> and not that complicated of a separate part >> --*(Violin I all on one staff for part, but only if it's not too complex > of >> a division rhythm-wise and for not that many measures in the score) >> c) always input all divisi as separate variables from the beginning and >> actually partcombine the divisi of the same instrument, so as to have >> multiple staves if need be on the part version. >> --*(Violin I from the start of engraving has already been pre-variabled > into >> 2/3 divisi with a ton of spacer rests throughout the whole part until the >> sections needed, then input the divisi notes, then go back to normal, etc > - >> at the end, use partcombine on the part, etc.) >> >> How do you approach printing string parts for a modern orchestral piece, >> regarding divisi? Does it depend or is your approach constant? >> Most of the music I am engraving has divisi similar to that of the 19th >> century, where it's not too separate of a part difference but some > upcoming >> projects I will be working on have rather diverse divisi spreads within > the >> same string part. >> So I wanted to begin the project 'correctly' before getting too deep in > and >> realizing I couldn't do parts easily. You can't really [easily] do a >> partcombine with just one variable taht has temporary voices on it. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> > lilypond-user@ >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > -- > Xavier Scheuer < > x.scheuer@ > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
