On Sunday 06 February 2005 04:08 pm, Graham Percival wrote: > On 5-Feb-05, at 9:40 AM, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > >> As I've said before, please tell me exactly what section(s) should > >> changed, and exactly > >> what should be changed or added. > > > > Table of Contents > > > > * GNU LilyPond \u2014 The music typesetter > > * Preface > > o Notes for version 2.4 > > * 1 Introduction > > o 1.1 Engraving > > o 1.2 Automated engraving > > Something like this? --> Relevant Features/Limitations > > (of the languages (TeX, LaTeX, Scheme, > > etc.) o 1.3 What symbols to engrave? > > o 1.4 Music representation > > o 1.5 Example applications > > > > While you do skirt the topic several times in the section, I think > > it deserves a subsection heading. daveA > > OK, got it. We should have a section about "Relevant > features/limitations". > I'm not certain if the intro is the best place for it -- maybe > somewhere in > chapter 7 or 8 would be better?
In the intro the prospective user is told about the programs lilypond uses. That is an appropriate place to mention that one can't use numbers in definitions--before the tutorial, where an example is given. Another? TeX has a memory limitation that I ran into once. That was interesting. daveA -- The only technical exercises for guitar which are worthy of the instrument consist in "Dynamic Guitar Technique". I promise miracles. Get it at: http://www.openguitar.com/dynamic.html daveA David Raleigh Arnold dra..at..openguitar.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
