>> \relative c' {
>> \clef "bass"
>> \time 3/4
>> << { <g b>2. ~ |
>> \oneVoice\shiftOff \hideNotes <g b>2 r4 \unHideNotes } \\
>> { d!2. ~ |
>> \oneVoice\shiftOff <d e g b>2. } \\
>> { f4 e2 ~ |
>> \oneVoice\shiftOff \hideNotes <d e g b>2 s4 \unHideNotes } >>
>> }
>
> While not precisely what your image shows, this is the best I could
> do:
>
> %%%%
> \relative d {
> \clef "bass"
> \time 3/4
> \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
> <<
> { <d g b>2.~ }
> { \shiftOn f4 e2~ }
> >>
> <d e g b>2.
> }
> %%%%
>
> The main difference is that the quarter note does not get its own
> column.
Thanks for your try. Alas, the notation you are suggesting is not
standard in piano notation – the first quarter needs a separate stem.
> To my eye, I would prefer to have the notes in the same column, as
> it is a little odd to see the quarter note appearing between the
> dotted half notes' heads and their dot. But I suppose that
> positioning does make the quarter note stand out.
AFAIK, there is no other solution possible from a music typographer's
standpoint.
It essentially boils down to the fact that inter-voice ties (and
slurs) would be tremendously helpful for notation of piano music.
Does anyone know what obstacles prevent an implementation of such a
feature?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
