Thanks Torsten!
For completeness, here is the MusicXML data.
It’s interesting to observe that MusicXML import is not done the same way by
different tools, hence my post.
JM
--
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE score-partwise PUBLIC "-//Recordare//DTD MusicXML 1.0 Partwise//EN"
"http://www.musicxml.org/dtds/partwise.dtd";>
<score-partwise>
<identification>
<miscellaneous>
<miscellaneous-field name="description">Nested repeats, each with
alternative endings.</miscellaneous-field>
</miscellaneous>
</identification>
<part-list>
<score-part id="P1">
<part-name>MusicXML Part</part-name>
</score-part>
</part-list>
<!--=========================================================-->
<part id="P1">
<measure number="1">
<attributes>
<divisions>1</divisions>
<key>
<fifths>0</fifths>
<mode>major</mode>
</key>
<time symbol="common">
<beats>4</beats>
<beat-type>4</beat-type>
</time>
<clef>
<sign>G</sign>
<line>2</line>
</clef>
</attributes>
<note>
<pitch>
<step>C</step>
<octave>4</octave>
</pitch>
<duration>4</duration>
<voice>1</voice>
</note>
</measure>
<!--=======================================================-->
<measure number="2">
<barline location="left">
<ending number="1" type="start"/>
</barline>
<note>
<pitch>
<step>E</step>
<octave>5</octave>
</pitch>
<duration>4</duration>
<voice>1</voice>
</note>
<barline location="right">
<ending number="1" type="stop"/>
</barline>
</measure>
<!--=======================================================-->
<measure number="3">
<barline location="left">
<ending number="2" type="start"/>
</barline>
<note>
<pitch>
<step>F</step>
<octave>5</octave>
</pitch>
<duration>4</duration>
<voice>1</voice>
</note>
<barline location="right">
<bar-style>light-heavy</bar-style>
<ending number="2" type="stop"/>
<repeat direction="backward"/>
</barline>
</measure>
<!--=======================================================-->
<measure number="4">
<note>
<pitch>
<step>G</step>
<octave>5</octave>
</pitch>
<duration>4</duration>
<voice>1</voice>
</note>
<barline location="right">
<bar-style>light-heavy</bar-style>
</barline>
</measure>
</part>
<!--=========================================================-->
</score-partwise>
> Le 25 juin 2018 à 20:08, Torsten Hämmerle <torsten.haemme...@web.de> a écrit :
>
> Hello Jacques,
>
> Without knowing the original MusicXML file, the LilyPond solution looks much
> more like a standard volta repeat with alternatives than the
> Finale/Musescore output.
>
> In any case, nested or not, a repeat barline will have to be set between
> adjacent volta brackets.
> Finale/Musescore misses out this repeat barline between the two volta
> brackets, whereas LilyPond's output is correct.
>
> Apart from that, these nested repeats can be confusing for several reasons
> and there may be better alternatives. But, in the end, this about faithful
> MusicXML representation and I'd say LilyPond wins this time.
>
> HTH,
> Torsten
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
