Wols Lists <antli...@youngman.org.uk> writes:
> On 22/05/18 21:11, Arle Lommel wrote:
> lmost right, but doesn’t function quite as Hindemith’s
>> notation does:
>>
>> * The Hindemith editions use time signatures /both/ above and in line,
>> but never at the same time. They serve different purposes. The
>> snipped removes the ability to do the in-line time signatures
>> because the time signature engraver is removed from the main staffs.
>> Easy enough to put in, but then I need to brush up enough to
>> selectively control where a time signature appears
>> * Hindemith also limits the effect of a superior time signature to a
>> single measure. The following measure reverts (with nothing
>> displayed) to the original meter. So replicating the Schott practice
>> would mean also hiding the time signature following such a measure.
>>
>>
>> But this is very useful as a suggestion of an approach. Maybe I can find
>> a way to selectively hide/show time signature changes in each context to
>> get what I want.
>>
> Another possible approach, for the temporary time changes, is can you
> display the new time signature without actually setting it? (Ie if the
> piece is in 2/4, you display 3/4 but lilypond still thinks its a 2/4 bar
> as before with no change.
>
> Then just use \times 2/3 {} for that bar so the notation displays correctly.
You mean \scaleDurations ?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
