Am 25. Mai 2018 18:18:13 MESZ schrieb Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org>:
>
>
>Il giorno ven 25 mag 2018 alle 8:42, Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org> 
>ha scritto:
>> [...]
>> 
>> But I did some experiments, and I identified the problem but can't 
>> give you a solution.
>> 
>> When you have separate bookparts it seems the "label tables" are 
>> separate, so you have two label tables with one entry each. It seems 
>> they are associated with the corresponding "output definitions", but 
>> the function receives only one of them. When I print the contents of 
>> both toc-item and the label table I get the following results:
>> 
>> (toc99 tocItemMarkup A TOC entry)
>> ((toc99 . 20))
>> 
>> (toc100 tocItemMarkup Another TOC entry)
>> ((toc99 . 20))
>> 
>> which indicates one or several issues along the way which I hope 
>> someone else will be able to clarify (and suggest a solution).
>> 
>
>For now I've found a workaround.
>As I was using bookparts only to have page breaks and a header for each
>
>part, I've added manual \pageBreak(s) and moved the header blocks 
>within the score blocks of each part and set print-all-headers to true.
>
>Now everything works almost fine.
>The last problem left is that the toc items of the included lilypond 
>file are treated as subsections, while the other items in my 
>markdown/latex file are sections; so the titles of the parts from the 
>lilypond file are nested within the last section of the main file. I'd 
>like them to be indipendent sections.
>
>Is it clear? I may provide a minimal example if you need it...
>Any idea for a solution?

There's a format string in the format-line expression. There you can change 
what is exported.
>
>Thanks in advance
>Federico

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to