foxfanfare <foxfanf...@gmx.com> writes: > David Kastrup wrote >> To wit: mapping primordial piano music with its >> loose relation of notes and ad-hoc voices and connecting articulation to >> LilyPond's concepts is pretty much the worst-case of complex music you >> can deal with. Orchestral/choral/symphonic music is comparatively >> straightforward in contrast, and even the nominal superset of organ >> music tends to be simpler in practice because it tends to be more >> rigidly mapped to voiced music rather than serving as a tool for >> texturing sound. > > lol I'm not sure it's very comforting!
If I were primarily a salesman instead of a developer, I would not be starving. You'll find lots of people ready to help with problems you encounter, and most importantly _able_ to help with problems you encounter because you can easily exchange and discuss fragments of LilyPond input on the mailing lists. But organizing piano music still is a more troublesome application in the vast scope of music LilyPond will handle. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
