>
>
>> From: Tom Cloyd <tomcloydm...@gmail.com>
> To: Frauke Jurgensen <frauk...@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:24:48 -0700
> Subject: Re: Is lilypond really suitable for composing?
> 100% in agreement. Developing that inner ear is immeasurably valuable, but
> it takes effort, and that effort is made only when there's motivation.
> Having only oneself to rely on provides the context for that motivation.
> (HA! Can you guess MY occupation?)
>


I call hogwash.  Developing inner ear has nothing to do with using pencil &
paper vs using notation software.  A more meaningful distinction is whether
you are composing by ear or not:

* If you are plucking out every note and chord at the piano, then notating
the ones you like with pencil & paper (or into notation software), you are
NOT developing your inner ear.
* If you come up with all the notes in your head and enter them directly
into notation software (or on paper), then you are are using your inner ear.


I agree that the processes of composition, arranging/orchestration and
engraving are distinct, and should be approached as such.  And I agree that
developing your inner ear is crucial.  But you can do all of that with the
help of notation software, or not.


David Elaine Alt
415 . 341 .4954                                           "Confusion is
highly underrated"
ela...@flaminghakama.com
skype: flaming_hakama
Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to