David Kastrup wrote
> Torsten Hämmerle <
> torsten.haemmerle@
> > writes:
> [...]
>> Yes, I know, but this code was meant for text in the first place and it's
>> quite common for slanted characters to stick out of their bounding boxes
>> to
>> the left to the right. Unfortunately, there are no slanted bounding boxes
>> (the are always upright"
>> But the main reason behind is that
>> \slanted "one two three"
>> should give the same result as
>> \slanted { "one" "two" "three" }
>
> Uh, no?
>
> \slanted "one two three"
>
> should likely give the same result as
>
> \slanted \line { "one" "two" "three" }
>
> but
>
> \slanted { "one" "two" "three" }
>
> is exactly equivalent to
>
> { \slanted "one" \slanted "two" \slanted "three" }
>
> and is connected with unslanted spaces.
Sorry for my misleading wording.
When saying "should give the same result" what I really meant was "should
produce the same visual result".
If I had widened the resulting stencil in order to prevent "slanted" text
stick out to the left and the right, this would have resulted in a wider
spacing when applied to separate chunks.
And, additionally, it is perfectly common for a (true) slanted/italic
character to protrude out of its box.
David Kastrup wrote
>> and when separately applying \slanted to "one", "two", and "three", a
>> widened box would lead to a wider spacing.
>
> This _is_ separately applying \slanted to "one", "two", and "three".
Yes, it certainly is, that's why I mentioned it. But it should not lead to a
wider spacing, exactly like
\italic "This is a sample text" or \italic \line { This is a sample text }
and
\italic { This is a sample text }
will have visually identical spacing
All the best,
Torsten
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
