Thanks David, one last question: is it possible to _check_ if x is a rest or a note?
(if... ) I just made an easier implementation of the function, but I need this check... 2018-03-05 18:12 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > paolo prete <paoloprete...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I see. > > Then I ask if is it possible at least, by placing a simple instruction > > inside lambda (x y) ( ...) while iterating, to: > > > > 1) replace x with a rest > > No. > > > 2) add a list of articulations (for example: "->", "\mp") to x > > Yes. > > Same reason: > > >> No. x and y are values stored in lists. The relation to their lists > >> is not passed into your function, so you cannot change it there. > >> > >> You'd need to use something like pair-for-each to modify the first > >> list in-place, and that gets old fast as music structures change. > >> > >> There is an actual reason functions like map-some-music are provided. > > -- > David Kastrup >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
