2018-02-06 16:10 GMT+01:00 Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > >> Sure, I attached a few from here >> <https://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ReverseLookup/23160> > > Thanks, but in this score there is not a single heavily rotated > hairpin; I would say that the differences are not of any importance. > >> <https://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ReverseLookup/23074>. > > Oh, and an orchestral score doesn't contain heavily rotated hairpins > by its very nature. What I see here is very irregular. > >> Of course there are many more, in these and other scores. > > Hmm. Here's a counterexample that contains `steep' hairpins > (cf. page 6 bottom, page 23 bottom, page 24 top, etc., etc.) – and the > ends are not vertically aligned. > > https://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ReverseLookup/246876 > > The exception, however, is a broken hairpin, page 30 – here I agree > that the continuation part should start (or end) vertically aligned. > Or may only `could' instead of `should', as for example page 38 > demonstrates. > > On the other hand, it probably solely depends on the typesetter: > page 40 contains steep hairpins that are all aligned... > > My conclusion: It could be a useful feature to have the ends of > rotated hairpins vertically aligned. However, I wouldn't like to have > this as the default. > > I'm CCing this e-mail to `bug-lilypond' so that this feature request > can be added to our issue database. > > > Werner
I'm a little late to the party this evening... Though, vertically aligned Hairpins were already discussed (a little) during code review of Ferneyhough hairpins https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043 but postponed. For an image see comment #2 I'm pretty sure they could still be implemented. `elbowed-hairpin' has it's own limitations, though Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
