A misunderstanding, sorry. Chopin etc was not MY argument. It was one in
the thread Thomas Morley thankfully referred to
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/turning-a-blind-eye-to-dotted-note-td209224.html
setting me on his "black list". One of many arguments (Thomas Hämmerle,
correct, not to query:
"Situations like my tuplet example (even with tuplet bracket/beam
crossing a
barline) can be found in Chopin's works among others, *so notes
stretching
over barlines are, albeit rare, absolutely possible* and not necessarily
a
"mistake". "
I know that hangers as I had a student pianist friend as studied (not
music).
There is an interesting list
https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/25562/help-with-interpreting-notation-in-chopins-nocturne-op-9-no-2.
There are some more, Tchaikowsky and others, mostly errors of the
editors!
-------------------
But to repeat and to correct the perspective, my basic question kept
unanswered and I do not want to repeat vain discussions again, it does
not make sense!
For short:
Why does not message me lilypond a warning (or something else) if I do
this?
\relative c'' {
d4 cis8 c8 b8. ais8 a gis
}
I can work on i. e.
\relative c'' {
d4 cis8 c8 b8. ais8 a gis a b c
}
No problem for lilypond! That is beyond my understanding, to long and
fro black list.
That was the start of the thread Thomas Morley referred to above.
Slightly connected to the question "duration longer than meter?" Isn't
it?
Regards
Am 03.02.2018 21:22, schrieb Noeck:
Hi Bernhard,
refer to examples of Chopin and Tschaikowsky ...
Do you have an example for that?
You can do anything that makes sense in terms of music:
- two voices at the same time may look like more notes than fit the
measure (as in the case of this thread).
- If it is unmetered music, you can use \cadenzaOn … \cadenzaOff
- If the meter changes without indication, you can \omit the
TimeSignature and still have correct measure lengths.
- If it is a implicit triplet or other tuplets you can use \tuplet or
\times.
I have never seen anything that does not fall into these categories.
Have you?
Best,
Joram
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
