Am 2018-01-18 um 17:48 schrieb Travis Weller <tra...@newmusic.coop>: > > Any reason not to try Frescobaldi? > > Well, I've checked it out and I'm kind of partial to the default editor > primarily because it uses a much nicer looking vector output. To my eye, > Frescobaldi's output view is rasterized at low resolution.
I can assure you that this is not normal with Frescobaldi. Did you use the precompiled binary or did you compile yourself? With other GUI toolkits (wxPython) I had to enable antialiasing, but since there’s no setting in Frescobaldi, either Qt does it always, or it’s activated in the code. I’m still using the stable version 2.20.0. Version 3 switched to Qt5, there could be a problem - can anyone confirm missing antialiasing? > If the answer to this question is that no one uses the default editor anymore > because everyone prefers an external one -- I guess too bad for me. I doubt > I'm the only one though. If Preview's link problem can't be fixed, I'd > suggest at least allowing Acrobat to be used as a viewer by solving whatever > problem prevents updating upon creation of a new PDF. Is Acrobat your default PDF viewer (i.e. opens when you doubleclick any PDF)? Greetlings, Hraban --- fiëé visuëlle Henning Hraban Ramm http://www.fiee.net _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
