Hello, Yes I am not a specialist of music engraving and certainly I must respect why the implementer made current implementation. Is there anyone who knows the reason of current behavior?
Regards, Tatejima Tomohiro 2018/01/17 午前7:16 "Simon Albrecht" <simon.albre...@mail.de>: On 16.01.2018 19:05, Tomohiro Tatejima wrote: > As for first issue, I can understand that `f d` does not need so much > space between notes as `f f`, as `d` does not collide with the stem of > `f`. But what I cannot understand is that `f a` or `f b` needs more > space than `f f` or `f g` (assume all notes are \stemUp'd). I suppose > they should be given same spacing as `f f` or `f g`. > I’m sure that this was given a lot of thought when the optical spacing was implemented and they clearly knew what they were doing. “seems a little odd to me” is not a reason for changing it, you’ll need to provide really good evidence why this should be changed. Best, Simon
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
